首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of combining several statistical methods with a flexible cutoff for identifying differentially expressed genes in pairwise comparison of EST sets
【2h】

Evaluation of combining several statistical methods with a flexible cutoff for identifying differentially expressed genes in pairwise comparison of EST sets

机译:评估将几种统计学方法与灵活的截止值相结合,用于鉴定EsT组成对比较中的差异表达基因

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The detection of differentially expressed genes from EST data is of importance for the discovery of potential biological or pharmaceutical targets, especially when studying biological processes in less characterized organisms and where large-scale microarrays are not an option. We present a comparison of five different statistical methods for identifying up-regulated genes through pairwise comparison of EST sets, where one of the sets is generated from a treatment and the other one serves as a control. In addition, we specifically address situations where the sets are relatively small (~2,000– 10,000 ESTs) and may differ in size. The methods were tested on both simulated and experimentally derived data, and compared to a collection of cold stress induced genes identified by microarrays. We found that combining the method pro- posed by Audic and Claverie with Fisher’s exact test and a method based on calculating the difference in relative frequency was the best combination for maximizing the detection of up-regulated genes. We also introduced the use of a flexible cutoff, which takes the size of the EST sets into consideration. This could be considered as an alternative to a static cutoff. Finally, the detected genes showed a low overlap with those identified by microarrays, which indicates, as in previous studies, low overall concordance between the two platforms.
机译:从EST数据中检测差异表达的基因对于发现潜在的生物学或药物靶标至关重要,尤其是在研究特征较少的生物中的生物学过程以及无法选择大规模微阵列的情况下。我们提供了通过成对比较EST集来鉴定上调基因的五种不同统计方法的比较,其中一组来自治疗,另一组用作对照。另外,我们专门解决了集合相对较小(约2,000至10,000个EST)且大小可能不同的情况。该方法在模拟和实验数据上进行了测试,并与通过微阵列鉴定的一组冷应激诱导基因进行了比较。我们发现,将Audic和Claverie提出的方法与Fisher的精确检验相结合,以及一种基于计算相对频率差异的方法,是最大化检测上调基因的最佳组合。我们还介绍了使用灵活截止值的方法,该方法考虑了EST集的大小。这可以被认为是静态截止的替代方案。最后,检测到的基因与微阵列所鉴定的基因显示出低重叠,这表明,如先前的研究所示,这两个平台之间的总体一致性较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号